I think this statement also applies to teachers and students, program providers and their audience (eg. young people), educators and the educated, we and they... This thinking is prescriptive and disempowering. In my opinion, challenging this thinking and the ego behind it is where sustainability education still needs to grow...
I attended a couple of meetings last week that got me thinking more about the importance of genuine relationships in the field of Education for Sustainability, in particular with young people (10-15 year olds, my area of interest). By this I mean relationships that involve truly listening to the voices and opinions of young people, the very audience to whom one is reaching out to and trying to 'educate'. Relationships that can put aside any expectations or vested interest in the outcomes of a project, and instead be flexible to the design that emerges through consultation first among the young people themselves and second among all stakeholders. Relationships that nurture the capacity and speak to the potential of young people to rise and meet their challenge with integrity, careful thought and enthusiasm.
This kind of approach, as referred to in the quote above, requires stepping back from the teacher / student model of education and moving towards the mentor / participant model. In this model the mentor can still have more experience, knowledge and insight in a particular subject area, but in order to empower the participants to become agents of their own education the mentor must allow them to own and drive the process. Young people that I've observed experience this in an authentic way are the same young people rising up as agents of change in their local community.
So who really is the agent of change? Honestly, I say it's the young people themselves, not the teacher or even the mentor...
If change occurs through, and is driven by, the participants, can teachers/mentors ever be sure of the outcome of their work?
ReplyDeleteDefinitely. The measure of an effective teacher/mentor is seeing the capacity of their participants rise to such levels where these young people consciously adopt changes to their every-day behaviour, take on leadership roles and eventually become the mentors to other groups of young people.
ReplyDeleteGreat question :)
I guess what I meant is that when learners control the process any change that results might be in an unexpected direction. What are the implications of this?
ReplyDeleteIt's an organic process and that's the beauty of it :) The implications are much like when anything organic takes an unexpected direction, it could be wonderful or an opportunity for lessons to be learned... much like my recent experience making compost, I'm a learner and the process took a very unexpected direction, or rather a very smelly direction :P
ReplyDelete